EASTWOOD v. SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 3:11-CV-03075. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120720849
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 19, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2012
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge. Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) filed in this case on April 24, 2012, by the Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. No party has filed objections to the Magistrate's findings. The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENT
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge. Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) filed in this case on April 24, 2012, by the Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. No party has filed objections to the Magistrate's findings. The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTI..
More
ORDER
P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge.
Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) filed in this case on April 24, 2012, by the Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. No party has filed objections to the Magistrate's findings.
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Certify Class (Doc. 23) is DENIED. However, such denial is made without prejudice to Plaintiff's ability to request an extension of time to file a new Motion to Certify Class within two weeks of the Court's ruling on Plaintiff's pending Motions for Summary Judgment and for Partial Summary Judgment (Docs. 17 and 20).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
