ALTURAS INDIAN RANCHERIA v. JEWELL, 2:14-CV-01407-TLN-CMK. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140825687
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. Plaintiff completed service of it's complaint in this matter on or about July 25, 2014. Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on August 12, 2014, setting it for a September 25, 2014, hearing. That hearing date would cause the Defendants' opposition to the motion to be due before its responsive pleading is due. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i). Therefore, the parties stipulate
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. Plaintiff completed service of it's complaint in this matter on or about July 25, 2014. Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on August 12, 2014, setting it for a September 25, 2014, hearing. That hearing date would cause the Defendants' opposition to the motion to be due before its responsive pleading is due. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i). Therefore, the parties stipulate ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff completed service of it's complaint in this matter on or about July 25, 2014. Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on August 12, 2014, setting it for a September 25, 2014, hearing. That hearing date would cause the Defendants' opposition to the motion to be due before its responsive pleading is due. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i). Therefore, the parties stipulate as follows:
1. That the hearing on Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment shall be continued to October 23, 2014; and
2. That Defendants reserve the right to raise arguments regarding the timeliness and/or form of this Motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
