Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Landmark Technology, LLC v. Jones Soda Co., 2:17-cv-00978-JLR. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20170905947 Visitors: 25
Filed: Jul. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . STIPULATION Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(d) and (j) Plaintiff Landmark Technology, LLC ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Jones Soda Co. and Jones Soda Co. (USA), Inc. ("Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys, stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiff's Complaint was filed on June 28, 2017; WHEREAS, Defendants were served with Pla
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(d) and (j) Plaintiff Landmark Technology, LLC ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Jones Soda Co. and Jones Soda Co. (USA), Inc. ("Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys, stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff's Complaint was filed on June 28, 2017;

WHEREAS, Defendants were served with Plaintiff's Complaint on July 11, 2017;

WHEREAS, Defendants' deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is August 1, 2017;

AND WHEREAS, the parties stipulate and agree that Defendants may have an additional thirty (30) days to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, extending the deadline to August 31, 2017.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on the parties' Stipulation, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for Defendants to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to August 31, 2017.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer