WILLIAMS v. SWARTHOUT, CIV S-11-1687 GGH P. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120504e44
Visitors: 17
Filed: May 03, 2012
Latest Update: May 03, 2012
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. He seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff has filed a motion for entry of default, but defendants have timely filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff's motion for default is denied and plaintiff must file an opposition to the motion to dismiss or this case will be dismissed. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion for default (Do
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. He seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff has filed a motion for entry of default, but defendants have timely filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff's motion for default is denied and plaintiff must file an opposition to the motion to dismiss or this case will be dismissed. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion for default (Doc..
More
ORDER
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. He seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a motion for entry of default, but defendants have timely filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff's motion for default is denied and plaintiff must file an opposition to the motion to dismiss or this case will be dismissed.
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's motion for default (Doc. 20) is denied;
2. Plaintiff must file an opposition to the motion to dismiss.
Source: Leagle
