KLUG v. WATTS REGULATOR COMPANY, 8:15CV61 (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20160701g34
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2016
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. BATAILLON , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the defendant's motion to strike confidential declaration of Thomas J. Hackney, Filing No. 112 in 8:15cv61 and Filing No. 111 in 8:16cv200. No response or objection has been filed. The Court reviewed the motion and argument of the defendants. The specified paragraphs objected to by the defendants, paragraphs 4 and 5, regard certain settlement agreements. Defendants object on the grounds of relevance and l
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. BATAILLON , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the defendant's motion to strike confidential declaration of Thomas J. Hackney, Filing No. 112 in 8:15cv61 and Filing No. 111 in 8:16cv200. No response or objection has been filed. The Court reviewed the motion and argument of the defendants. The specified paragraphs objected to by the defendants, paragraphs 4 and 5, regard certain settlement agreements. Defendants object on the grounds of relevance and la..
More
ORDER
JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the defendant's motion to strike confidential declaration of Thomas J. Hackney, Filing No. 112 in 8:15cv61 and Filing No. 111 in 8:16cv200. No response or objection has been filed. The Court reviewed the motion and argument of the defendants. The specified paragraphs objected to by the defendants, paragraphs 4 and 5, regard certain settlement agreements. Defendants object on the grounds of relevance and lack of foundation. After reviewing the paragraphs, the Court finds the argument stated by the defendants is persuasive. The Court sees no relevance in the settlement of these various cases. Therefore, the Court will grant the motion and strike paragraphs 4 and 5.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Watts Regulator Company's motion to strike, Filing No. 112 in 8:15cv61 and Filing No. 111 in 8:16cv200, is granted.
2. Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Thomas J. Hackney declaration, Filing No. 108 in 8:15cv61 and Filing No. 106 in 8:16cv200, are stricken.
Source: Leagle
