SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND v. CROWN BUILDING MAINTENANCE CO., CV 12 5328 JSC. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20121218845
Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 04, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(a), the parties hereby stipulate to an extension of time for Defendant Crown Building Maintenance Co., doing business as Able Building Maintenance Co. ("ABLE"), to respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. RECITALS 1. On October 16, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint pursuant to Sections 502 and 515 of
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(a), the parties hereby stipulate to an extension of time for Defendant Crown Building Maintenance Co., doing business as Able Building Maintenance Co. ("ABLE"), to respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. RECITALS 1. On October 16, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint pursuant to Sections 502 and 515 of t..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(a), the parties hereby stipulate to an extension of time for Defendant Crown Building Maintenance Co., doing business as Able Building Maintenance Co. ("ABLE"), to respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint.
RECITALS
1. On October 16, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint pursuant to Sections 502 and 515 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), alleging Defendant ABLE has failed to pay in full certain contributions due and owing to the SEIU Pension Fund.
2. On November 16, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint generally alleging Defendant ABLE failed to make additional contributions that it was required to make.
3. A response to the First Amended Complaint is currently due on December 3, 2012.
4. For good cause, the parties hereby stipulate and agree that a response to the First Amended Complaint in this action shall be due no later than December 17, 2012. The parties hereby aver that the date will not alter the date of any event or delay any deadline already set by the Court.
STIPULATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(a), the parties hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Defendant ABLE to respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint to no later than December 17, 2012.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
