Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bardman, 3:16-cv-02023 (JST). (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160921814 Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 19, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . WHEREAS, on April 18, 2016, plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint in the above-captioned action (the "Complaint") asserting claims against defendants Erik K. Bardman and Jennifer F. Wolf ("Defendants" and, together with Plaintiff, the "Parties"); WHEREAS, Defendants filed motions to dismiss the Complaint (ECF Nos. 16-18), which were originall
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

WHEREAS, on April 18, 2016, plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint in the above-captioned action (the "Complaint") asserting claims against defendants Erik K. Bardman and Jennifer F. Wolf ("Defendants" and, together with Plaintiff, the "Parties");

WHEREAS, Defendants filed motions to dismiss the Complaint (ECF Nos. 16-18), which were originally set to be heard on September 29, 2016, but the hearing has been rescheduled for October 18, 2016 (ECF No. 20);

WHEREAS, the Parties previously stipulated, and the Court ordered, that the Case Management Conference would be set for October 12, 2016, approximately two weeks after the original hearing date for Defendants' motions to dismiss (ECF No. 8); and

WHEREAS, the Parties believe it would be more efficient, given the rescheduling of the hearing on Defendants' motions to dismiss to October 18, 2016, to also reschedule the Case Management Conference accordingly.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the attorneys for Plaintiff and the attorneys for Defendants, as follows:

1. The Case Management Conference currently set for October 12, 2016 is rescheduled for November 2, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. November 9, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.

ATTESTATION (CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3))

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer