Filed: Jan. 26, 2011
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2011
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. WHEREAS, on November 12, 2010, the Court issued an Order approving the Parties' stipulation to modify the briefing schedule for the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint ("SCAC") and Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss; WHEREAS, the SCAC filed by Plaintiffs runs for sixty (60) pages; WHEREAS, in order to ensure that the Parties can fully address all issues thoroughly and in a manner benefi
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. WHEREAS, on November 12, 2010, the Court issued an Order approving the Parties' stipulation to modify the briefing schedule for the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint ("SCAC") and Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss; WHEREAS, the SCAC filed by Plaintiffs runs for sixty (60) pages; WHEREAS, in order to ensure that the Parties can fully address all issues thoroughly and in a manner benefic..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
WHEREAS, on November 12, 2010, the Court issued an Order approving the Parties' stipulation to modify the briefing schedule for the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint ("SCAC") and Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss;
WHEREAS, the SCAC filed by Plaintiffs runs for sixty (60) pages;
WHEREAS, in order to ensure that the Parties can fully address all issues thoroughly and in a manner beneficial to the Court, the Parties agree that the page limits permitted by the local rules of the Court should be enlarged;
WHEREAS, the Parties further agree that the deadlines to file their respective briefs shall be extended by two weeks, but that the May 19, 2011 hearing date previously established by the Court shall remain unchanged. The extended filing deadlines comply with the applicable local rules of the Court.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS THEREFORE HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between undersigned counsel, subject to approval of the Court, that:
1. The briefing schedule on defendants' motion to dismiss shall be as follows:
• Opening Brief due: Monday, February 14, 2011
• Opposition due: Friday, April 15, 2011
• Reply due: Thursday, May 5, 2011
2. The page limits for the briefs shall be enlarged as follows: the opening brief shall be no longer than forty (40) pages; the opposition brief shall be no longer than forty-five (45) pages; and the reply brief shall be no longer than twenty (20) pages.
SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
