Filed: Nov. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Relator Mary Kaye Welch ("Relator") filed this action under the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729, et seq., against Defendants My Left Foot Children's Therapy, LLC ("My Left Foot"), Ann Marie Gottlieb, and Jon Gottlieb (collectively, "Defendants," and together with Relator, the United States, and the State of Nevada, the "Parties"). The Parties by and through their respective counsel
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Relator Mary Kaye Welch ("Relator") filed this action under the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729, et seq., against Defendants My Left Foot Children's Therapy, LLC ("My Left Foot"), Ann Marie Gottlieb, and Jon Gottlieb (collectively, "Defendants," and together with Relator, the United States, and the State of Nevada, the "Parties"). The Parties by and through their respective counsel,..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
Relator Mary Kaye Welch ("Relator") filed this action under the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729, et seq., against Defendants My Left Foot Children's Therapy, LLC ("My Left Foot"), Ann Marie Gottlieb, and Jon Gottlieb (collectively, "Defendants," and together with Relator, the United States, and the State of Nevada, the "Parties"). The Parties by and through their respective counsel, have reached a settlement in this case. Accordingly, there being no objection to the relief sought, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties respectfully request that the Court enter the below [Proposed] Order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1. The allegations in the operative complaint against Defendants are dismissed with prejudice as to the Relator, and are dismissed as to the United States and the State of Nevada consistent with the Settlement Agreement, with prejudice as to the "Covered Conduct" as defined in the Settlement Agreement and otherwise without prejudice;
2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over any disputes that may arise regarding compliance with the Settlement Agreement; and
3. Having determined there is no just reason for delay, this Order shall be entered accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
