Gunter v. United Federal Credit Union, 3:15-cv-00483-MMD-WGC. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20171221e85
Visitors: 17
Filed: Dec. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2017
Summary: ORDER EXTENDING TIME STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] (FIRST REQUEST) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S REPORT REGARDING PROPOSED CLASS NOTICE AND NOTICE PLAN [ECF No. 98] (First Request) Plaintiff Tonya Gunter ("Gunter") and Defendant United Federal Credit Union ("United") (United and Gunter are collectively referred to as "the Parties") by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate for the Cou
Summary: ORDER EXTENDING TIME STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] (FIRST REQUEST) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S REPORT REGARDING PROPOSED CLASS NOTICE AND NOTICE PLAN [ECF No. 98] (First Request) Plaintiff Tonya Gunter ("Gunter") and Defendant United Federal Credit Union ("United") (United and Gunter are collectively referred to as "the Parties") by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate for the Cour..
More
ORDER EXTENDING TIME STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] (FIRST REQUEST)
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S REPORT REGARDING PROPOSED CLASS NOTICE AND NOTICE PLAN [ECF No. 98] (First Request)
Plaintiff Tonya Gunter ("Gunter") and Defendant United Federal Credit Union ("United") (United and Gunter are collectively referred to as "the Parties") by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate for the Court to enter an Order extending the time for United to file its Response to Gunter's Report Regarding Proposed Class Notice and Notice Plan [ECF No. 98] from December 15, 2017, to December 29, 2017.
Defendant has advised Plaintiff that it is currently investigating several components of Plaintiff's proposed class notice and notice plan, including with third party vendors, and requires additional time to prepare its response. Accordingly, Defendant requests and Plaintiff has agreed that the Court should grant this stipulation and extend the date for filing Defendant's response to ECF No. 98 until December 29, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
