Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

GARCIA v. ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC., 4:14-cv-00596-SBA. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140401b53 Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2014
Summary: NOTICE OF CONSENT TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT SANDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Please take notice that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), Defendants Lyft, Inc. and Enterprise Holdings, Inc. hereby provide their written consent for Plaintiff Miguel Garcia to amend his class action complaint, which shall be filed contemporaneously with this Notice. Further, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(
More

NOTICE OF CONSENT TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

SANDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.

Please take notice that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), Defendants Lyft, Inc. and Enterprise Holdings, Inc. hereby provide their written consent for Plaintiff Miguel Garcia to amend his class action complaint, which shall be filed contemporaneously with this Notice.

Further, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(b), the Parties hereby stipulate that Defendants Lyft, Inc. and Enterprise Holdings, Inc. shall have until April 28, 2014 to file responsive pleadings to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. The extended response time will not alter any other deadlines set by Court order in this action, and mirrors the extension the Parties agreed to following the filing of Plaintiff's original complaint. (See Dkt. Nos. 19, 25; Declaration of Benjamin S. Thomassen, attached hereto as Exhibit A.)

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer