Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

AMIRHAMZEH v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 14-CV-02123 VC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141014983 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 01, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 01, 2014
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME RE DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS CURRENTLY SET FOR OCTOBER 16, 2014; [PROPOSED] ORDER AS MODIFIED VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff Ashley Amirhamzeh, on behalf of all others similarly situated (collectively "Plaintiff'), on the one hand, and Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("WFB") and Trilegiant Corporation ("Trilegiant")(collectively, "Defendants") on the other, by and through their undersigned counsel, he
More

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME RE DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS CURRENTLY SET FOR OCTOBER 16, 2014; [PROPOSED] ORDER AS MODIFIED

VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff Ashley Amirhamzeh, on behalf of all others similarly situated (collectively "Plaintiff'), on the one hand, and Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("WFB") and Trilegiant Corporation ("Trilegiant")(collectively, "Defendants") on the other, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court continue the hearing on WFB's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings("WFB's Motion")and Trilegiant's Motion to Dismiss or Stay the Case and Compel Arbitration, or in the alternative, to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) ("Trilegiant's Motion") (collectively referred to as "Defendants' Motions"), which is currently set for October 16, 2014 to October 28, 2014. The parties declare in support of this request as follows:

WHEREAS, the Defendants filed their Motions and effectuated service on Plaintiff on August 8, 2014;

WHEREAS, on August 22, 2014, the Parties filed a Stipulated Request For Order Changing Time;[Proposed] Order, and Declaration of Farrah Mirabel In Support, wherein the Parties stipulated to: extend the deadline on which Plaintiff must file her opposition briefs to Defendants' Motions to September 12, 2014; extend the deadline on which Defendants must file their respective reply briefs to September 26, 2014; and reschedule the hearing on Defendants' Motions from October 2, 2014 to October 16, 2014;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Order of this Court dated August 22, 2014 ("August 22 Order"), the Court set the hearing for Defendants Motions for October 16, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. and the initial Case Management Conference for October 28, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs lead counsel is based in Newport Beach, California, and expects to travel to San Francisco to appear in Court both to argue Defendants' Motions on October 16, 2014 and attend the Case Management Conference on October 28, 2014;

WHEREAS, Trilegiant's lead counsel, Kenneth M. Kliebard of the law firm of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, is based in Chicago, Illinois, and expects to travel to San Francisco to appear in Court both to argue Trilegiant's Motion on October 16, 2014 and attend the Case Management Conference on October 28, 2014;

WHEREAS, WFB's lead counsel, John T. Cu of the law firm of Hanson Bridgett LLP has a scheduled business meeting on October 15-16 in Richmond, Virginia;

WHEREAS, having met and conferred and reached agreement that, to promote efficiency by saving on costs and fees incurred related to multiple travels by Plaintiffs counsel and Trilegiant's counsel, to accommodate Mr. Cu's conflict on October 16, 2014, and to promote judicial economy, the Parties hereby request that the Court continue the hearing on Defendants' Motions currently set for October 16, 2014 to October 28, 2014, the date currently set for the initial Case Management Conference;

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, the parties through their respective attorneys stipulate as follows:

1. The hearing on Defendants' Motions currently set for October 16, 2014, will be continued to October 28, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. to be heard immediately before or contemporaneously with the initial Case Management Conference also scheduled for October 28, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.

2. All other deadlines set forth in the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order, including the deadline for the parties to submit a Joint Case Management Statement, shall remain as currently set.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ATTESTATION PER LOCAL CIVIL RULE 5-1(I)(3)

I am a signatory to this document and am the person whose ECF and ID and passwords are being utilized in its electronic filing with the Court. I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories hereto.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 30th day of September at San Francisco, California.

[PROPOSED] ORDER AS MODIFIED

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

The hearing on Defendants' Motions currently set for October 16, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., will be continued to 10:00 a.m. on October 30, 2014 to be heard before (or contemporaneously with)the Initial Case Management Conference currently set for October 30, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.

All other deadlines set forth in the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order, including the deadline for the parties to submit a Joint Case Management Statement, shall remain as currently set.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer