Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Evanson v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-01899-AC. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180330888 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant's time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from March 28, 2018 to April 27, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant requests this extension due to her counsel
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant's time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from March 28, 2018 to April 27, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment.

Defendant requests this extension due to her counsel's heavy workload for the months of March and April 2018. Defendant's counsel respectfully requests this additional time to expend the necessary time to review the record and to evaluate the issues Plaintiff raised, and to submit Defendant's response for review by this Court.

The parties further stipulate that all subsequent deadlines set forth in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly.

The parties stipulate in good faith, with no intent to prolong proceedings unduly.

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer