MOTORIST COMMERCIAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. SOLTIS, 2:13-cv-01647-TLN-CKD. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140630a48
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jun. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2014
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendant MCM Insurance Agency Incorporated's ("Defendant MCM") 1 Motion to Dismiss Count Four of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint 2 (ECF No. 22) and Defendant Kevin Anthony Soltis's ("Defendant Soltis") Motion to Dismiss Count Four of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (ECF No. 23). Plaintiffs Motorist Commercial Mutual Insurance Company ("Motorist") and Bill Ackerman Tire Center ("Ackerman") have filed statements of
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendant MCM Insurance Agency Incorporated's ("Defendant MCM") 1 Motion to Dismiss Count Four of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint 2 (ECF No. 22) and Defendant Kevin Anthony Soltis's ("Defendant Soltis") Motion to Dismiss Count Four of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (ECF No. 23). Plaintiffs Motorist Commercial Mutual Insurance Company ("Motorist") and Bill Ackerman Tire Center ("Ackerman") have filed statements of n..
More
ORDER
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendant MCM Insurance Agency Incorporated's ("Defendant MCM")1 Motion to Dismiss Count Four of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint2 (ECF No. 22) and Defendant Kevin Anthony Soltis's ("Defendant Soltis") Motion to Dismiss Count Four of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (ECF No. 23). Plaintiffs Motorist Commercial Mutual Insurance Company ("Motorist") and Bill Ackerman Tire Center ("Ackerman") have filed statements of non-opposition to both Defendants' MCM and Soltis's motions. (See ECF Nos. 30, 31.) Accordingly, Defendants MCM and Soltis's motions to Dismiss Count Four of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (ECF Nos. 22, 23) are hereby GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. MCM was erroneously sued as AHM Insurance Agency.
2. The Court had previously dismissed Plaintiffs' Fourth Cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty (see Order, ECF No. 18), but allowed Plaintiffs leave to amend.
Source: Leagle
