Parish of Cameron v. BP America Production Co., 16-0540. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20180510a84
Visitors: 11
Filed: May 09, 2018
Latest Update: May 09, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT TERRY A. DOUGHTY , District Judge . For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to the extent adopted by this Court after a de novo review of the entire record, and for those additional reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling in the related case of Parish of Cameron v. Auster Oil & Gas Co., No. 16-cv-0530, IT IS ORDERED that the Motions and Supplemental Motions to Remand [Doc. Nos. 12, 20, 32 & 35] filed by Plaintiff Parish of Cameron
Summary: JUDGMENT TERRY A. DOUGHTY , District Judge . For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to the extent adopted by this Court after a de novo review of the entire record, and for those additional reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling in the related case of Parish of Cameron v. Auster Oil & Gas Co., No. 16-cv-0530, IT IS ORDERED that the Motions and Supplemental Motions to Remand [Doc. Nos. 12, 20, 32 & 35] filed by Plaintiff Parish of Cameron a..
More
JUDGMENT
TERRY A. DOUGHTY, District Judge.
For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to the extent adopted by this Court after a de novo review of the entire record, and for those additional reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling in the related case of Parish of Cameron v. Auster Oil & Gas Co., No. 16-cv-0530,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motions and Supplemental Motions to Remand [Doc. Nos. 12, 20, 32 & 35] filed by Plaintiff Parish of Cameron and Intervenor the State of Louisiana ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Costal Management, and Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Thomas F. Harris are GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is hereby instructed to remand this matter to the 38th Judicial District Court, Cameron Parish, Louisiana, forthwith.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the related Motion for Oral Argument [Doc. No. 60] and Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority [Doc. No. 62] are DENIED AS MOOT.
Source: Leagle
