Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Copytele, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation, 3:13-cv-00380-EMC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141205784 Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order is entered into by and between Plaintiff CopyTele, Inc. ("CopyTele") and Defendants E Ink Holdings, Inc., a Taiwanese corporation, E Ink Corporation, a Delaware corporation (collectively "E Ink"), and AU Optronics Corporation ("AUO"), a Taiwanese corporation. WHEREAS, CopyTele filed its complaint i
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order is entered into by and between Plaintiff CopyTele, Inc. ("CopyTele") and Defendants E Ink Holdings, Inc., a Taiwanese corporation, E Ink Corporation, a Delaware corporation (collectively "E Ink"), and AU Optronics Corporation ("AUO"), a Taiwanese corporation.

WHEREAS, CopyTele filed its complaint in this action on January 28, 2013;

WHEREAS, on April 29, 2013, AUO filed a motion to compel arbitration and to stay the litigation, and E Ink filed motions to dismiss all claims against it and in the alternative to stay the claims against it pending arbitration between CopyTele and AUO;

WHEREAS, on July 9, 2013, in light of CopyTele's agreement to arbitrate its claims against AUO, this Court stayed the claims against all defendants pending the resolution of the arbitration (Dkt. No. 91);

WHEREAS, CopyTele filed its Demand for Arbitration before the American Arbitration Association on September 17, 2013, and AUO filed its Answer in the arbitration on October 28, 2013;

WHEREAS, on May 8, 2014, the Court continued the Case Management Conference set for May 15, 2014 to December 11, 2014, after the Final Arbitration Hearing was to be concluded (Dkt. No. 103);

WHEREAS, the Final Arbitration Hearing was held on November 10-November 21, 2014, in San Francisco, California;

WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Final Arbitration Hearing, CopyTele and AUO agreed to a post-hearing briefing schedule, with opening briefs due January 15, 2015 and response briefs due February 5, 2015, and the Tribunal confirmed this schedule in Procedural Order No. 11, issued November 26, 2014;

WHEREAS, in light of the status of the post-hearing briefing in the arbitration, the parties respectfully request that the Court continue the Case Management Conference to a date after the post-hearing briefing has been concluded.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that:

1. The Case Management Conference shall be continued from December 11, 2014 to March 5, 2015 at 10:30 a.m.

2. Pursuant to Civil General Standing Order No. 6, the Case Management Conference Statement will be due on or before February 26, 2015.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. For good cause shown:

1. The Case Management Conference shall be continued from December 11, 2014 to March 12, 2015 at 10:30 a.m. 2. Pursuant to Civil General Standing Order No. 6, the Case Management Conference Statement will be due on or before February 26, 2015. March 5, 2015
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer