U.S. v. Rosas-Rosas, 18mj20755-CEA-MMA. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190401a28
Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING JUDGMENT MICHAEL M. ANELLO , District Judge . Defendant Cosme Rosas-Rosas appeals the judgment entered following his guilty plea conviction of misdemeanor illegal entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1325. 1 Rosas-Rosas challenges the constitutionality of his criminal proceedings under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fifth Amendment. The grounds for Rosas-Rosas' challenge have been uniformly rejected by other courts in this District. See United States v. M
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING JUDGMENT MICHAEL M. ANELLO , District Judge . Defendant Cosme Rosas-Rosas appeals the judgment entered following his guilty plea conviction of misdemeanor illegal entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1325. 1 Rosas-Rosas challenges the constitutionality of his criminal proceedings under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fifth Amendment. The grounds for Rosas-Rosas' challenge have been uniformly rejected by other courts in this District. See United States v. Mo..
More
ORDER AFFIRMING JUDGMENT
MICHAEL M. ANELLO, District Judge.
Defendant Cosme Rosas-Rosas appeals the judgment entered following his guilty plea conviction of misdemeanor illegal entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325.1 Rosas-Rosas challenges the constitutionality of his criminal proceedings under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fifth Amendment. The grounds for Rosas-Rosas' challenge have been uniformly rejected by other courts in this District. See United States v. Mouret-Romero, No. 18MJ22829-WQH, 2019 WL 1166951 (S.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2019); United States v. Rivas-Villarreal, No. 18-MJ-20112-KSC-H-1, 2019 WL 937876 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2019); United States v. Soto-Felix, No. 18-MJ-20617-CEA-H-1, 2019 WL 848758 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2019); United States v. Mazariegos-Ramirez, No. 18MJ22276-WQH, 2019 WL 338923 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2019); United States v. Oscar Chavez-Diaz, No. 18MJ20098-KSC-AJB, Doc. No. 29; United States v. Miguel Jimenez-Ruiz, No. 18MJ20457-BLM-GPC, Doc. No. 18. This Court adopts the reasoning of those decisions and likewise concludes that the adjudication of Rosas-Rosas' criminal proceedings through a dedicated 1325 misdemeanor calendar did not violate his constitutional rights.
Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The Court has jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3402.
Source: Leagle
