Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ELHINDI v. STATE, 2:15-CV-00009-MCE-AC. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20161212794 Visitors: 23
Filed: Dec. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 08, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCOVERY: [ PROPOSED ] ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate District Judge . WHEREAS the court continued the trial date of this matter from February 21, 2017, to September 25, 2017, a period of approximately seven (7) months; WHEREAS the parties are engaging in potential settlement negotiations and seek to do so without and/or prior to incurring the legal expenses of expert witnesses; IT IS HEREBY STIULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, attorne
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCOVERY: [PROPOSED] ORDER

WHEREAS the court continued the trial date of this matter from February 21, 2017, to September 25, 2017, a period of approximately seven (7) months;

WHEREAS the parties are engaging in potential settlement negotiations and seek to do so without and/or prior to incurring the legal expenses of expert witnesses;

IT IS HEREBY STIULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, attorneys for the parties herein:

The Court is hereby requested to adopt a new scheduling order herein, extending the following deadlines as follows:

The current Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 26 expert disclosure deadline of December 27, 2016, to the statutory deadline of ninety (90) days before trial, to June 27, 2016, and extend the current rebuttal expert disclosure deadline of January 27, 2016, to July 27, 2017.

The order and directions of this court contained in Scheduling Order dated December 17, 2015, and October 13, 2016, otherwise remain in full force and effect.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court having considered the parties' stipulation seeking to extend the expert disclosure schedule, the court approves the following schedule extending relevant dates for six (6) months:

Expert disclosure: June 27, 2017 Rebuttal Expert Dislcosure: July 27, 2017

The order and directions of this court contained in its Scheduling Orders dated December 17, 2015, and October 13, 2016, otherwise remain in full force and effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer