In re Inductors Antitrust Litigation, 5:18-cv-00198-EJD. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180607b16
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO REMOVE LITIGATION FROM ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM Re: Dkt. No. 174 EDWARD J. DAVILA , District Judge . The parties have filed an administrative motion requesting that this action be removed from this District's Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") Multi-Option Program because they believe that private mediation is most likely to offer the most efficient ADR option for the needs of this case. Dkt. No. 74. However, because private ADR (including mediati
Summary: ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO REMOVE LITIGATION FROM ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM Re: Dkt. No. 174 EDWARD J. DAVILA , District Judge . The parties have filed an administrative motion requesting that this action be removed from this District's Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") Multi-Option Program because they believe that private mediation is most likely to offer the most efficient ADR option for the needs of this case. Dkt. No. 74. However, because private ADR (including mediatio..
More
ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO REMOVE LITIGATION FROM ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM
Re: Dkt. No. 174
EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge.
The parties have filed an administrative motion requesting that this action be removed from this District's Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") Multi-Option Program because they believe that private mediation is most likely to offer the most efficient ADR option for the needs of this case. Dkt. No. 74. However, because private ADR (including mediation) is one of the options available under the Multi-Option Program, the motion is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
