Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. GONZALEZ, CR 13-912-SJO. (2016)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20160513a27 Visitors: 19
Filed: Apr. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 28, 2016
Summary: ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING [Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1(a)(6); 18 U.S.C. 3143 (a)] PAUL L. ABRAMS , Magistrate Judge . The defendant having been arrested in this District pursuant to a warrant issued by the United States District Court for the Central dist. CA for alleged violation(s) of the terms and conditions of his/her [probation] [supervised release]; and The Court having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(a)(6) and 18 U.S.C. 3143(a), T
More

ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING [Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1(a)(6); 18 U.S.C. 3143 (a)]

The defendant having been arrested in this District pursuant to a warrant issued by the United States District Court for the Central dist. CA for alleged violation(s) of the terms and conditions of his/her [probation] [supervised release]; and

The Court having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(a)(6) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a),

The Court finds that:

A. (✓) The defendant has not met his/her burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he/she is not likely to flee if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). This finding is based on No legal status in U.S.: Nature of allegations; inability to post bail of moment. ____________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ and/or

B. ( ) The defendant has not met his/her burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he/she is not likely to pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). This finding is based on: ________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained pending the further revocation proceedings.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer