Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Rios v. Rose, CV 15-7503-MWF(JCx). (2016)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20161024673 Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2016
Summary: JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . This action came on regularly for trial between October 4, 2016, and October 19, 2016, in Courtroom 1600 of this United States District Court. Plaintiff was Monica Rios. Plaintiff was represented by Waukeen Q. McCoy, Esq., of the Law Offices of Waukeen Q. McCoy, and Brandon Anand, Esq., of Anand Law, PC. Defendant Derrick Rose was represented by Mark D. Baute, Esq., and Courtney A. Palko, Esq., of Baute Crochetiere & Gilford, LLP
More

JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL

This action came on regularly for trial between October 4, 2016, and October 19, 2016, in Courtroom 1600 of this United States District Court. Plaintiff was Monica Rios. Plaintiff was represented by Waukeen Q. McCoy, Esq., of the Law Offices of Waukeen Q. McCoy, and Brandon Anand, Esq., of Anand Law, PC. Defendant Derrick Rose was represented by Mark D. Baute, Esq., and Courtney A. Palko, Esq., of Baute Crochetiere & Gilford, LLP. Defendants Randall Hampton and Ryan Allen were represented by Michael D. Monico, Esq., and Scott J. Krischke, Esq., of Monico & Spevack, and Patrick M. Maloney, Esq., of the Maloney Firm, APC.

A jury of eight persons was regularly empaneled and sworn. Witnesses were sworn and testified and exhibits were admitted into evidence. After hearing the evidence and arguments of counsel, the jury was duly instructed by the Court and the cause was submitted to the jury. The jury deliberated and thereafter returned a special verdict as follows:

First Claim: Sexual Battery

Question 1

Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that Defendant Derrick Rose, Randall Hampton, and/or Ryan Allen intended to cause a harmful or offensive contact with Plaintiff Monica Rios's breasts, buttocks or vagina, and a sexually offensive contact with Plaintiff Monica Rios resulted?

Derrick Rose Yes ____ No X Randall Hampton Yes ____ No X Ryan Allen Yes ____ No X

If you answered Question 1 "Yes" as to any Defendant, please answer Question 2 as to that Defendant. If you answered Question 1 "No" as to all Defendants, please go to Question 5.

Question 2

Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that Plaintiff Monica Rios did not consent to be touched by Defendants Derrick Rose, Randall Hampton, and/or Ryan Allen?

Derrick Rose Yes ____ No ____ Randall Hampton Yes ____ No ____ Ryan Allen Yes ____ No ____

If you answered Question 2 "Yes" as to any Defendant, please answer Question 3 as to that Defendant. If you did not answer "Yes" to Question 2 as to any Defendant, please go to Question 5.

Question 3

Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that Plaintiff Monica Rios was harmed by Defendant Derrick Rose, Randall Hampton, and/or Ryan Allen's conduct?

Derrick Rose Yes ____ No ____ Randall Hampton Yes ____ No ____ Ryan Allen Yes ____ No ____

If you answered Question 3 "Yes" as to any Defendant, please answer Question 4.

Question 4 (Conspiracy)

If you answered Question 3 "Yes" as to any Defendant, do you find any other Defendant or Defendants liable for sexual battery on the basis of conspiracy and not on the basis of his own sexual activity with Plaintiff Monica Rios?

Derrick Rose Yes ____ No ____ Randall Hampton Yes ____ No ____ Ryan Allen Yes ____ No ____

Please go to Question 5.

Second Claim: Battery

Question 5

Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that Defendants Derrick Rose, Randall Hampton, and/or Ryan Allen touched Plaintiff Monica Rios with the intent to harm or offend her?

Derrick Rose Yes ____ No X Randall Hampton Yes ____ No X Ryan Allen Yes ____ No X

If you answered Question 5 "Yes" as to any Defendant, please answer Question 6 as to that Defendant. If you answered Question 5 "No" as to all Defendants, please go to Question 8.

Question 6

Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that Plaintiff Monica Rios did not consent to be touched by Defendants Derrick Rose, Randall Hampton, and/or Ryan Allen?

Derrick Rose Yes ____ No ____ Randall Hampton Yes ____ No ____ Ryan Allen Yes ____ No ____

If you answered Questions 6 "Yes" as to any Defendant, please answer Question 7 as to that Defendant. If you did not answer "Yes" to Question 6 as to any Defendant, please go to Question 8.

Question 7

Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that Plaintiff Monica Rios was harmed by Defendants Derrick Rose, Randall Hampton, and/or Ryan Allen?

Derrick Rose Yes ____ No ____ Randall Hampton Yes ____ No ____ Ryan Allen Yes ____ No ____

Please go to Question 8.

Third Claim: Trespass

Question 8

Has Plaintiff Monica Rios proven her claim of trespass (as defined in Instruction No. 20) against Defendants Derrick Rose, Randall Hampton, and/or Ryan Allen?

Derrick Rose Yes ____ No X Randall Hampton Yes ____ No X Ryan Allen Yes ____ No X

Please go to Question 9.

Damages

Question 9

If you answered "No" to Questions 3, 4, 7, and 8 as to all Defendants or you did not reach Questions 3, 4, 7, and 8 as to any Defendant, then your verdict is complete. Have the foreperson sign and date this form.

If you answered "Yes" to Questions 3, 4, 7, or 8 as to any Defendant, then please answer Question 10.

Question 10

What are Plaintiff Monica Rios' total damages, if any?

Economic loss to the present: ________________________ Economic loss in the future: _________________________ Non-economic loss to the present: ____________________ Non-economic loss in the future: ______________________

Please answer Question 11.

Question 11 (Punitive Damages)

Do you find by clear and convincing evidence that one or more of the Defendants acted with malice, oppression, and/or fraud, in conscious disregard of the rights of Plaintiff Monica Rios?

Derrick Rose Yes ____ No ____ Randall Hampton Yes ____ No ____ Ryan Allen Yes ____ No ____

Now, therefore, pursuant to Rules 54 and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that final judgment in this action be entered as follows:

1. On the claim for sexual battery in violation of California Civil Code section 1708.5: Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Derrick Rose, Randall Hampton, and Ryan Allen, and Plaintiff Monica Rios shall take nothing on this claim by her Complaint. 2. On the claim for battery: Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Derrick Rose, Randall Hampton, and Ryan Allen, and Plaintiff Monica Rios shall take nothing on this claim by her Complaint. 3. On the claim for trespass: Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Derrick Rose, Randall Hampton, and Ryan Allen, and Plaintiff Monica Rios shall take nothing on this claim by her Complaint. 4. On the claim for gender violence, in violation of California Civil Code section 52.4: Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Derrick Rose, Randall Hampton, and Ryan Allen, and Plaintiff Monica Rios shall take nothing on this claim by her Complaint. 5. On the claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress: Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Derrick Rose, Randall Hampton, and Ryan Allen, and Plaintiff Monica Rios shall take nothing on this claim by her Complaint. 6. On the claim for violation of California Civil Code section 51.7: Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Derrick Rose, Randall Hampton, and Ryan Allen, and Plaintiff Monica Rios shall take nothing on this claim by her Complaint. 7. On the claim for declaratory relief: Based on the factual findings embodied in the jury's special verdict, the Court DENIES the request for declaratory relief. Judgement on this claim is entered in favor of Defendants Derrick Rose, Randall Hampton, and Ryan Allen, and Plaintiff Monica Rios shall take nothing on this claim by her Complaint.

Defendants Derrick Rose, Randall Hampton, and Ryan Allen are further awarded their costs as provided by law.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer