BOSTON v. GARCIA, 2:10-cv-1782-KJM DAD P. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20130701664
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 27, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2013
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. On April 24, 2013, plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge's order filed March 20, 2013, denying his motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36(a)(6), denying his motion for a stay, and denying his request to order defendants to provide him with a copy of his deposition transcript. The court has construed the objections as a request for reconsideration. Under E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. On April 24, 2013, plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge's order filed March 20, 2013, denying his motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36(a)(6), denying his motion for a stay, and denying his request to order defendants to provide him with a copy of his deposition transcript. The court has construed the objections as a request for reconsideration. Under E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "c..
More
ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
On April 24, 2013, plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge's order filed March 20, 2013, denying his motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36(a)(6), denying his motion for a stay, and denying his request to order defendants to provide him with a copy of his deposition transcript. The court has construed the objections as a request for reconsideration. Under E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds the magistrate judge's ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed March 20, 2013, is affirmed.
Source: Leagle
