Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mendota Insurance Company v. McCormick Barstow LLP, 2:17-cv-02505-MMD-PAL. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190130732 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 22, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE MIRANDA M. DU , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2) and LR 7-1, it is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff, MENDOTA INSURANCE COMPANY ("Mendota"), by and through its counsel of record, Kolesar & Leatham; and Defendants, McCORMICK BARSTOW LLP; WADE M. HANSARD, ESQ.; SPRINGEL & FINK LLP; and MICHAEL R. MERRITT, ESQ. (collectively, "Defendants" and with Mendota, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record,
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2) and LR 7-1, it is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff, MENDOTA INSURANCE COMPANY ("Mendota"), by and through its counsel of record, Kolesar & Leatham; and Defendants, McCORMICK BARSTOW LLP; WADE M. HANSARD, ESQ.; SPRINGEL & FINK LLP; and MICHAEL R. MERRITT, ESQ. (collectively, "Defendants" and with Mendota, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, that the above-entitled matter be dismissed with prejudice, the Parties to bear their own attorney's fees and costs. The Parties further stipulate that the instant Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement reached.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer