COOK v. CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, 1:16-CV-00429-DAD-JLT. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160726590
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 25, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] 1 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR FIFTEEN-DAY EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 21) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Based upon the stipulation of counsel to allow a second extension of time to file a responsive pleading, the Court ORDERS: 1. The stipulation is GRANTED. Defendants, CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, TOM WILLIAM WEIL, WILLIAM ROBERT SMITH, and SHANNON HAYES SHALL file their pleading responsive to the first amended complaint, no later th
Summary: [PROPOSED] 1 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR FIFTEEN-DAY EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 21) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Based upon the stipulation of counsel to allow a second extension of time to file a responsive pleading, the Court ORDERS: 1. The stipulation is GRANTED. Defendants, CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, TOM WILLIAM WEIL, WILLIAM ROBERT SMITH, and SHANNON HAYES SHALL file their pleading responsive to the first amended complaint, no later tha..
More
[PROPOSED]1 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR FIFTEEN-DAY EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
(Doc. 21)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
Based upon the stipulation of counsel to allow a second extension of time to file a responsive pleading, the Court ORDERS:
1. The stipulation is GRANTED. Defendants, CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, TOM WILLIAM WEIL, WILLIAM ROBERT SMITH, and SHANNON HAYES SHALL file their pleading responsive to the first amended complaint, no later than August 10, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Counsel are referred to the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California. Unlike the Central District of California, this Court does not require counsel to file pleadings using a 14-point font.
Source: Leagle
