Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Soto v. UNUM Group, 2:18-cv-08825-SJO-SK. (2019)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20191108c69 Visitors: 18
Filed: Nov. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2019
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(A)(1) [Filed concurrently with Stipulation] S. JAMES OTERO , District Judge . ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as to all parties. Each party shall bear his or its own attorneys' fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

[FRCP 41(A)(1)

[Filed concurrently with Stipulation]

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as to all parties. Each party shall bear his or its own attorneys' fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer