Oakland Bulk & Oversized Terminal, LLC v. City of Oakland, 16-cv-07014-VC. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180111a61
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING OAKLAND'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2 Re: Dkt. No. 197 VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . Cappio's understanding of the meaning of the ordinance might have relevance if it informed the way the City enforced the ordinance, in a case where OBOT was challenging the particular manner in which the ordinance was being enforced. See Hoye v. City of Oakland, 653 F.3d 835 , 849-50 (9th Cir. 2011). But OBOT contends the ordinance is unlawful as written or simply may not be applied to OBOT
Summary: ORDER DENYING OAKLAND'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2 Re: Dkt. No. 197 VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . Cappio's understanding of the meaning of the ordinance might have relevance if it informed the way the City enforced the ordinance, in a case where OBOT was challenging the particular manner in which the ordinance was being enforced. See Hoye v. City of Oakland, 653 F.3d 835 , 849-50 (9th Cir. 2011). But OBOT contends the ordinance is unlawful as written or simply may not be applied to OBOT...
More
ORDER DENYING OAKLAND'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2
Re: Dkt. No. 197
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
Cappio's understanding of the meaning of the ordinance might have relevance if it informed the way the City enforced the ordinance, in a case where OBOT was challenging the particular manner in which the ordinance was being enforced. See Hoye v. City of Oakland, 653 F.3d 835, 849-50 (9th Cir. 2011). But OBOT contends the ordinance is unlawful as written or simply may not be applied to OBOT. Therefore, the testimony from Cappio's deposition cited by OBOT in its summary judgment papers seems largely irrelevant. Nonetheless, the City's motion in limine to exclude testimony from Cappio regarding her understanding of the ordinance is denied because this matter is better addressed at trial than on a blanket basis by way of motion in limine.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
