Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Steinmetz v. American Honda Finance, 2:19-cv-00067-APG-GWF. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190418e03 Visitors: 15
Filed: Apr. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 16, 2019
Summary: JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT [FIRST REQUEST] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Plaintiff Jacqueline Steinmetz ("Plaintiff") and Defendant American Honda Finance ("AHF") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby move jointly to extend Plaintiff's deadline to file a Response to AHF's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (21) twenty-one days: 1. On January 10, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a Complain
More

JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT

[FIRST REQUEST]

Plaintiff Jacqueline Steinmetz ("Plaintiff") and Defendant American Honda Finance ("AHF") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby move jointly to extend Plaintiff's deadline to file a Response to AHF's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (21) twenty-one days:

1. On January 10, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint [ECF Dkt. 1].

2. On February 25, 2019, Experian filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [ECF Dkt.14].

3. On March 11, 2019, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint [ECF Dkt. 28].

4. On April 3, 2019 AHF filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint [ECF Dkt. 47].

5. Plaintiff's Response is due April 17, 2019.

6. Plaintiff and AHF have agreed to extend Plaintiff's response twenty-one days in order to allow Plaintiffs' counsel to contact the clients to address AHF'S pending motion to dismiss and obtain approval to file the response. As a result, both Plaintiff and AHF hereby request this Court to further extend the date for Plaintiff to respond to AHF's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint until May 8, 2019. This stipulation is made in good faith, is not interposed for delay, and is not filed for an improper purpose.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer