Intellisoft, Ltd v. ACER America Corporation, 17-cv-06272-PJH. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171226505
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2017
Summary: ORDER RE OBJECTION TO REPLY EVIDENCE Re: Dkt. No. 29 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . The court is in receipt of defendants' objection to reply evidence. Defendants may file a sur-reply of no longer than five pages by Friday, December 29, 2017. The sur-reply may only address new evidence or argument plaintiff raised for the first time in its reply. Other than defendants' sur-reply, the court does not intend to allow any further briefing on the present motion. IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER RE OBJECTION TO REPLY EVIDENCE
Re: Dkt. No. 29
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
The court is in receipt of defendants' objection to reply evidence. Defendants may file a sur-reply of no longer than five pages by Friday, December 29, 2017. The sur-reply may only address new evidence or argument plaintiff raised for the first time in its reply.
Other than defendants' sur-reply, the court does not intend to allow any further briefing on the present motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
