Duran v. Baughman, CV 17-5922 AB(JC). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180718735
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDRE BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody ("Petition"), and all of the records herein, including the June 6, 2018 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommendation"). The Court approves and accepts the Report and Recommendation, but notes that cont
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDRE BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody ("Petition"), and all of the records herein, including the June 6, 2018 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommendation"). The Court approves and accepts the Report and Recommendation, but notes that contr..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ANDRE BIROTTE, JR., District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody ("Petition"), and all of the records herein, including the June 6, 2018 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommendation"). The Court approves and accepts the Report and Recommendation, but notes that contrary to the indication in the Report and Recommendation, petitioner has counsel in this action.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition is denied on the merits, this action is dismissed with prejudice and Judgment be entered accordingly.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Report and Recommendation, and the Judgment herein on counsel for petitioner and respondent.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
