Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BURGOYNE v. KRONENBERGER, C 11-06376 EDL. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130628973 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2013
Summary: JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE PARTIES' MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5 and the Court's June 14, 2013 Order Regarding Administrative Motions To Seal (Docket No. 207), Plaintiff Henry M. Burgoyne III ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Karl Kronenberger ("Kronenberger") and Kronenberger Rosenfeld, LLP (collectively referred to as
More

JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE PARTIES' MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5 and the Court's June 14, 2013 Order Regarding Administrative Motions To Seal (Docket No. 207), Plaintiff Henry M. Burgoyne III ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Karl Kronenberger ("Kronenberger") and Kronenberger Rosenfeld, LLP (collectively referred to as "Defendants") jointly submit this stipulated request to file under seal the following documents:

1. Portions of Exhibit C to Kronenberger's Declaration In Support Of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment As To Accounting Claim should be redacted to remove references to financial information; 2. Exhibits D and E to Kronenberger's Declaration In Support Of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment As To Accounting Claim; 3. Exhibit E to the Declaration of Shane K. Anderies In Support Of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment As To Accounting Claim; 4. Exhibit F to the Declaration of Shane K. Anderies In Support Of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment As To Accounting Claim; 5. Exhibits B and C to Kronenberger's Declaration In Support Of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment As to Defendants' Counterclaims; 6. A portion of Exhibit A to the Declaration of Rory C. Quintana In Support Of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Adjudication should be redacted to remove the references to the Firm's server usernames; 7. A portion of Exhibit G to the Declaration of Rory C. Quintana In Support Of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Adjudication should be redacted to remove the name of a third party; 8. A portion of Exhibit B to the Declaration of Rory C. Quintana In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment As To Accounting Claim should be redacted to remove a reference to a certain Firm client; 9. Portions of Exhibit D to the Declaration of Rory C. Quintana In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment As To Accounting Claim should be redacted to remove references to certain Firm clients; 10. Portions of Exhibit H to the Declaration of Rory C. Quintana In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment As To Accounting Claim should be redacted to remove all financial information; 11. Exhibit U to the Declaration of Rory C. Quintana In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment As To Accounting Claim; 12. A portion of Exhibit D to the Declaration of Rory C. Quintana In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment As To Defendants' Counterclaims should be redacted to remove a reference to a certain Firm client; 13. Portions of Exhibit E to the Declaration of Rory C. Quintana In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment As To Defendants' Counterclaims should be redacted to remove references to financial information; 14. Exhibit J to the Declaration of Rory C. Quintana In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment As To Defendants' Counterclaims; 15. Exhibit W to the Declaration of Henry M. Burgoyne In Support Of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Adjudication; 16. Exhibit A to the Declaration of Henry M. Burgoyne In Support Of Plaintiff's Reply In Support Of Motion for Partial Summary Adjudication As To Defendants' Counterclaims; 17. Exhibit D to the Declaration of Henry M. Burgoyne In Support Of Plaintiff's Reply In Support Of Motion for Partial Summary Adjudication As To Defendants' Counterclaims; 18. A portion of Exhibit D to the Declaration of Rory C. Quintana In Support Of Plaintiff's Reply In Support Of Motion for Partial Summary Adjudication As To Defendants' Counterclaims should be redacted to remove reference to the termination accounting; 19. A portion of Exhibit B to the Declaration of Henry M. Burgoyne In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment As To Accounting Claim should be redacted to remove client names and other identifying information; 20. A portion of Exhibit A to the Declaration of Henry M. Burgoyne In Support Of Plaintiff's Reply In Support Of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment As To Accounting Claim should be redacted to remove references to hours billed in 2011; 21. Exhibit O to the Declaration of Henry M. Burgoyne In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment As To Accounting Claim; 22. A portion of Exhibit R to the Declaration of Henry M. Burgoyne In Support Of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Adjudication should be redacted to remove credit card information; 23. Exhibit B to the Declaration of Henry M. Burgoyne In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment As Defendants' Counterclaims; and 24. Exhibit C to the Declaration of Henry M. Burgoyne In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment As To Accounting Claim.

The exhibits listed above contain sensitive business and personal financial information that Defendants designated as confidential and/or highly confidential, pursuant to the parties' September 24, 2012 Stipulated Protective Order. A sealing order is appropriate where, as here, the document contains private, protectable information. Civ. L.R. 79-5 (sealing order is appropriate where the party requesting such an order establishes that "the document, or portions thereof is privileged or protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under the law"). Accordingly, the parties request that the Court enter an order sealing the aforementioned exhibits.

Defendants will lodge with the Court unredacted and highlighted copies of the relevant documents, with the sealable information identified.

ORDER

Having considered the papers regarding the parties' Joint Stipulated Request to File Under Seal Documents Related to the Parties' Motions for Summary Judgment, and finding good cause therefor, the parties' Joint Stipulated Request to File Under Seal Documents Related to the Parties' Motions for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer