Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Unverferth v. Liberty Union High School District, 3:15-cv-01721-EMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160713846
Filed: Jun. 03, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO (1) EXTEND TIME TO COMPLETE MEDIATION AND (2) CONTINUE FURTHER STATUS CONFERENCE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiffs SARAH UNVERFERTH and P.C., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem Sarah Unverferth (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendants LIBERTY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, ERIC VOLTA, JOHN SAYLOR, PATRICK WALSH, JENNIFER KOETT, ILENE FOSTER, and SANDRA GUARDADO (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their counsel, hereby
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO (1) EXTEND TIME TO COMPLETE MEDIATION AND (2) CONTINUE FURTHER STATUS CONFERENCE

STIPULATION

Plaintiffs SARAH UNVERFERTH and P.C., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem Sarah Unverferth (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendants LIBERTY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, ERIC VOLTA, JOHN SAYLOR, PATRICK WALSH, JENNIFER KOETT, ILENE FOSTER, and SANDRA GUARDADO (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, the Court referred this matter to ADR for mediation, and initially ordered the parties to complete mediation by March 8, 2016. [Doc. 59, 60];

WHEREAS, the Court, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, continued the deadline to complete to mediation to June 22, 2016 and set the matter for post-mediation Further Status Conference on July 21, 2016. [Doc. 63];

WHEREAS, mediation in this matter is currently scheduled for June 9, 2016;

WHEREAS, the crux of Plaintiff P.C.'s damages claim in this action is founded upon the contention that he has suffered physical injuries as well as significant psychological and emotional harm as a result of Defendants' conduct;

WHEREAS, with respect to Plaintiff P.C.'s damages claim, Defendants, who also contest all other aspects of Plaintiffs' claims, including liability and causation, contend, among other things, that Plaintiff P.C. did not suffer the alleged injuries for which he now seeks recovery, and/or that such alleged injuries/conditions were pre-existing and/or were otherwise not caused by any unlawful, wrongful, negligent, or other conduct by Defendants sufficient to give rise to a finding of liability against, or warrant recovery from, Defendants for such injuries.

WHEREAS, the Parties, in a good faith effort to facilitate discovery and prepare for mediation, have met and conferred regarding, and agreed upon, the scope of Defendants' discovery relating to Plaintiff P.C.'s mental health history and records;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff was unable to provide Defendants with the HIPAA releases required to obtain such records until the last week of March 2016 and the first week of April 2016;

WHEREAS, Defendants issued and served subpoenas on Plaintiff's mental health providers within a few days of receiving the HIPAA releases;

WHEREAS, Defendants have received records from the majority of Plaintiff P.C.'s mental health providers, they have been unable — despite Plaintiffs having provided all requested authorizations and despite Defendants' repeated efforts to procure cooperation and compliance with the subpoenas from the mental health providers — to obtain records from the remaining providers (including the primary therapist who treated Plaintiff both before and after the subject incident, and the primary counselling facility that provided Plaintiff with individual and family counseling following the subject incident);

WHEREAS, the Parties anticipate that Defendants will need to move the Court for an order compelling the remaining providers to produce the outstanding records subpoenaed, but recognize that there is insufficient time to obtain such order (including meeting and conferring and submitting a joint letter brief to the court; and the filing of a properly noticed motion seeking orders compelling the production of records from Plaintiff's providers), enforce the order, and then review and analyze the records prior to the present mediation deadline;

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the outstanding mental health records contain information necessary to engage in a meaningful and productive mediation, and are essential to the parties and the mediator's ability to evaluate Plaintiffs' claims, particularly concerning the issues of causation and damages;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have been diligently pursuing discovery, but have had problems with a number of Defendants' responses to Plaintiffs' Requests for Documents and Special Interrogatories;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have met and conferred with Defendants regarding their concerns about Defendants' responses, and believe there is a way forward, but will not have the information they need in time for the currently scheduled mediation;

WHEREAS, in light of the unanticipated further delay in obtaining Plaintiff P.C.'s mental health records and the above-mentioned discovery issues, the Parties also believe and agree that there exists good cause to continue the mediation deadline by 90 days, to allow the parties sufficient time to take the steps necessary to compel, obtain, and review the outstanding records, and coordinate among the parties and mediator to set a new mediation date;

WHEREAS, the Parties conferred with the mediator, Greta Schnetzler, and informed her of the present circumstances, and said mediator stated that she was supportive of the requested continuance;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and among the Parties to this action, that, based on the foregoing, the Parties' June 22, 2016 deadline to complete mediation shall be continued by 90 days and the July 21, 2016 status conference shall be vacated and rescheduled accordingly.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation of the Parties, it is hereby ordered that:

1. The Parties' June 22, 2016 deadline to complete Mediation is continued by 90 days to September 20, 2016, and

2. The July 21, 2016 Further Status Conference is continued to October 6, 2016 at 10:30 a.m. Joint Status Report due September 29, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer