Price v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-00755-JCM-VCF. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170830b88
Visitors: 19
Filed: Aug. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY REMAND OF THE CASE OR CROSS-MOTION TO AFFIRM. (Second Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended for approximately two weeks from August 31, 2017 to September 15, 2017 . This is Defendant's second request for extension. Good cause exists to
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY REMAND OF THE CASE OR CROSS-MOTION TO AFFIRM. (Second Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended for approximately two weeks from August 31, 2017 to September 15, 2017 . This is Defendant's second request for extension. Good cause exists to g..
More
JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY REMAND OF THE CASE OR CROSS-MOTION TO AFFIRM.
(Second Request)
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended for approximately two weeks from August 31, 2017 to September 15, 2017. This is Defendant's second request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Additional time is required as Counsel for Defendant (Counsel) has over 50+ active matters, of which two dispositive motions per week until the early October. Counsel has been on intermittent medical leave due to her chronic migraines and daily recurrent headaches. As a result of unanticipated medical leave, Counsel became behind on her caseload. As such, Counsel respectfully requests additional time in order to address the issues raised in Plaintiff's Motion. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. Plaintiff has no objection to the requested relief.
The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
