Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re Various Social Security Cases, 0:16-cv-062-JMH (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Kentucky Number: infdco20190712b64 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jul. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT JOSEPH M. HOOD , Senior District Judge . In accordance with the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order entered contemporaneously herewith, Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g), IT IS ORDERED as follows: (1) The Commissioner's motions to remand pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) are DENIED; (2) The Commissioner's decisions denying the plaintiffs' disability claims on redetermination are hereby REVERSED; (3) The plaint
More

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order entered contemporaneously herewith, Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), IT IS ORDERED as follows:

(1) The Commissioner's motions to remand pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) are DENIED;

(2) The Commissioner's decisions denying the plaintiffs' disability claims on redetermination are hereby REVERSED;

(3) The plaintiffs' requests to reinstate benefits pending the Commissioner's decision on remand are GRANTED consistent with this opinion;

(4) Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), these matters are REMANDED to the SSA for further proceedings consistent with the Sixth Circuit's decision in Hicks v. Commissioner of Social Security, 909 F.3d 786 (6th Cir. 2018);

(5) These matters are STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court, to be restored to the active docket upon motion by any party for good cause shown;

(6) Any pending requests for relief in these actions are DENIED AS MOOT;

(7) This is a FINAL AND APPEALABLE JUDGMENT and there is NO JUST CAUSE FOR DELAY.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer