Clark v. Fisher, 2:17-cv-02574-TLN-GGH. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180918a95
Visitors: 19
Filed: Sep. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 14, 2018
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner has filed a motion for a 10 day extension of time to file a Reply to respondent's Opposition to his motion for Stay and Abeyance. This will be the second extension that petitioner has filed for but, the court will provide this one more extension. Any further extension will require a showing of exceptional grounds in support of any such request. In light of the foregoing IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Petitioner shall have 10 days from t
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner has filed a motion for a 10 day extension of time to file a Reply to respondent's Opposition to his motion for Stay and Abeyance. This will be the second extension that petitioner has filed for but, the court will provide this one more extension. Any further extension will require a showing of exceptional grounds in support of any such request. In light of the foregoing IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Petitioner shall have 10 days from th..
More
ORDER
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner has filed a motion for a 10 day extension of time to file a Reply to respondent's Opposition to his motion for Stay and Abeyance. This will be the second extension that petitioner has filed for but, the court will provide this one more extension. Any further extension will require a showing of exceptional grounds in support of any such request.
In light of the foregoing IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
Petitioner shall have 10 days from the date of this Order to file his Reply to petitioner's Opposition to petitioner's Stay and Abeyance request.
Source: Leagle
