CLAY v. AT&T INTEGRATED DISABILITY SERVICE CENTER, 2:17-cv-00749-KJM-GGH. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171024h62
Visitors: 16
Filed: Oct. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2017
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS , Magistrate Judge . The parties to this action have stipulated to an extension of time for defendant AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3 to respond to the Third Amended Complaint, ECF No. 25 (listed on the docket as the Second Amended Complaint), for a period of two weeks. ECF No. 25. In light of the foregoing and good cause appearing therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Defendant shall file its response to the Third (Second) Amended Complaint on or before November
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS , Magistrate Judge . The parties to this action have stipulated to an extension of time for defendant AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3 to respond to the Third Amended Complaint, ECF No. 25 (listed on the docket as the Second Amended Complaint), for a period of two weeks. ECF No. 25. In light of the foregoing and good cause appearing therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Defendant shall file its response to the Third (Second) Amended Complaint on or before November 7..
More
ORDER
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.
The parties to this action have stipulated to an extension of time for defendant AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3 to respond to the Third Amended Complaint, ECF No. 25 (listed on the docket as the Second Amended Complaint), for a period of two weeks. ECF No. 25.
In light of the foregoing and good cause appearing therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
Defendant shall file its response to the Third (Second) Amended Complaint on or before November 7, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
