Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Nichols v. Credit Union 1, 2:17-cv-02337-APG-GWF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180911a14 Visitors: 25
Filed: Sep. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 07, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR POSTPONEMENT OF THE HEARING ON THE SAME (First Request) GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to LR 6-1, Plaintiff CATHERINE NICHOLS ("Plaintiff") and Defendants CREDIT UNION 1 ("Credit Union") and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., ("Experian") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate that Experian may have until Thursday, October 18, 2018, to file a respons
More

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR POSTPONEMENT OF THE HEARING ON THE SAME

(First Request)

Pursuant to LR 6-1, Plaintiff CATHERINE NICHOLS ("Plaintiff") and Defendants CREDIT UNION 1 ("Credit Union") and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., ("Experian") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate that Experian may have until Thursday, October 18, 2018, to file a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF Dkt. 51), that Plaintiff be granted until October 25 to file any reply, and that the motion be heard on October 29-30. Pursuant to LR 7-2(b), Experian's response is presently due September 18, 2018. The Parties also request that the Court continue the hearing on the Motion to Compel, presently scheduled for October 4, 2018 (ECF No. 55), to accommodate the extended response date. This is the Parties' first request to extend these dates. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel addresses very complex issues relating to Experian's internal computing systems and ability, or inability, to ascertain Plaintiff's class. In light of these complex and detailed issues, the extension of the response and hearing dates will allow Plaintiff and Experian to consider alternate means of resolving, narrowing, or otherwise addressing their discovery dispute, allowing the Court to conserve its limited resources. Additionally, this time will permit Experian to garner additional information necessary to fully respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel.

This stipulation is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer