Estate of Toribio v. City of Santa Rosa, 18-cv-02151-YGR. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190205962
Visitors: 22
Filed: Feb. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSIVE SEPARATE STATEMENT AND SEPARATE STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL MATERIAL FACTS YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . The Court STRIKES Plaintiffs' filings at Docket Nos. 66 and 67. The Court's Standing Order provides, in pertinent part: 2. Responsive Separate Statement: The papers opposing a motion for summary judgment shall include one Responsive Separate Statement which: (1) incorporates the facts in the moving separate statement; (2) provides a
Summary: ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSIVE SEPARATE STATEMENT AND SEPARATE STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL MATERIAL FACTS YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . The Court STRIKES Plaintiffs' filings at Docket Nos. 66 and 67. The Court's Standing Order provides, in pertinent part: 2. Responsive Separate Statement: The papers opposing a motion for summary judgment shall include one Responsive Separate Statement which: (1) incorporates the facts in the moving separate statement; (2) provides a r..
More
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSIVE SEPARATE STATEMENT AND SEPARATE STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL MATERIAL FACTS
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.
The Court STRIKES Plaintiffs' filings at Docket Nos. 66 and 67. The Court's Standing Order provides, in pertinent part:
2. Responsive Separate Statement: The papers opposing a motion for summary judgment shall include one Responsive Separate Statement which: (1) incorporates the facts in the moving separate statement; (2) provides a response to each of the facts in the correspondingly numbered paragraph in the moving separate statement; and (3) identifies any additional material facts that the party contends will establish a genuine issue to be tried. This Responsive Separate Statement shall indicate as to each fact whether the party contends the fact is "disputed" or "undisputed." If the opposing party contends that the fact is in dispute, the party must cite to evidence in the record which establishes the dispute.
3. Page Limits for Separate Statements: Unless a party has obtained prior permission from this Court, the Supporting Separate Statement is limited to no more than fifteen (15) pages, and the Responsive Separate Statement is limited to no more than five (5) additional pages beyond the number of pages in the opening statement.
4. Attestation Required for Separate Statements: The Supporting and Responsive Separate Statement each must be signed by counsel (or by the party, if unrepresented by counsel) who has reviewed the document and can attest as follows: "I attest that the evidence cited herein fairly and accurately supports [or disputes] the facts as asserted."
Standing Order In Civil Cases ¶ 9(c)(2)-(4). Plaintiffs here filed a 15-page response to defendant's separate statement (Dkt. No. 66) as well as a separate document with 8 pages of additional facts (Dkt. No. 67). Further, the separate document stating additional facts did not include the required attestation.
Plaintiffs shall refile a responsive separate statement in compliance with the Court's Standing Order no later than February 6, 2019. Plaintiffs are cautioned that future violations of the Court's Standing Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
