Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Martin v. Bell, 4:19-cv-4034. (2020)

Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20200121c83 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 17, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 17, 2020
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 12). The parties have reached a settlement in this matter. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), an action may be dismissed by court order at the plaintiff's request, on terms the court considers proper. Accordingly, the Joint Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED, and the above-styled case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE subject to the terms of the
More

ORDER

Before the Court is the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 12). The parties have reached a settlement in this matter. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), an action may be dismissed by court order at the plaintiff's request, on terms the court considers proper.

Accordingly, the Joint Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED, and the above-styled case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE subject to the terms of the settlement agreement. If any party desires that the terms of settlement be a part of the record therein, those terms should be reduced to writing and filed with the Court within thirty (30) days of the entry of this judgment. The Court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen this action upon cause shown that the settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer