Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Wu v. McAleenan, C 19-02523 SK. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20191115872 Visitors: 10
Filed: Nov. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 14, 2019
Summary: THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND DATES; and ORDER SALLIE KIM , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record, and Defendants, by and through their attorney of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to a 60-day extension of time within which the Defendants must serve the answer or otherwise respond in the above-entitled action. Defendants will file their response on or before January 15, 2020. In light of the third requested extension for Defendants
More

THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND DATES; and ORDER

Plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record, and Defendants, by and through their attorney of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to a 60-day extension of time within which the Defendants must serve the answer or otherwise respond in the above-entitled action. Defendants will file their response on or before January 15, 2020.

In light of the third requested extension for Defendants' response to the Complaint, the parties request that, if Plaintiff has not filed a motion for summary judgment by February 14, 2020, Defendants must file their motion for summary judgment by March 16, 2020.

Date: November 13, 2019 Respectfully submitted, DAVID L. ANDERSON United States Attorney /s/ _______________________ SARA WINSLOW Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendants Dated: November 13, 2019 /s/ ___________________________ JUSTIN X. WANG Attorneys for Plaintiff

ORDER

The Court HEREBY APPROVES the parties' stipulation. However, the Court will not grant any further extensions without a showing of extraordinary good cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer