Filed: Oct. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 11, 2019
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE OR DISMISS DEFENDANT'S ANSWER — $1,666,666 COUNTERCLAIM MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Having considered Plaintiff LegalForce RAPC Worldwide P.C.'s Motion to Strike or Dismiss Defendant's Answer — $1,666,666 Counterclaim ("Motion"), and no opposition to the Motion having been filed, the Court finds that there is good cause to GRANT the Motion. 1 THEREFORE, Defendant's Answer — $1,666,666 Counterclaim, filed with this Court o
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE OR DISMISS DEFENDANT'S ANSWER — $1,666,666 COUNTERCLAIM MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Having considered Plaintiff LegalForce RAPC Worldwide P.C.'s Motion to Strike or Dismiss Defendant's Answer — $1,666,666 Counterclaim ("Motion"), and no opposition to the Motion having been filed, the Court finds that there is good cause to GRANT the Motion. 1 THEREFORE, Defendant's Answer — $1,666,666 Counterclaim, filed with this Court on..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE OR DISMISS DEFENDANT'S ANSWER — $1,666,666 COUNTERCLAIM
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
Having considered Plaintiff LegalForce RAPC Worldwide P.C.'s Motion to Strike or Dismiss Defendant's Answer — $1,666,666 Counterclaim ("Motion"), and no opposition to the Motion having been filed, the Court finds that there is good cause to GRANT the Motion.1
THEREFORE,
Defendant's Answer — $1,666,666 Counterclaim, filed with this Court on August 29, 2019, is hereby
[x] stricken in its entirety.
[] dismissed with prejudice.
The answer filed June 21, 2019, as supplemented June 27, 2019, shall remain defendant's operative response to the Second Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
