Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company v. Bray, 2:18-cv-02996 RGK (FFMx). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180807b61
Visitors: 37
Filed: Aug. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 03, 2018
Summary: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . On May 24, 2018, the Clerk entered default against Defendant JAMES BRAY dba TEXAS PRIDE TRAILERS (ECF No. 11.) On June 25, 2018, Plaintiff ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY filed a Motion for Default Judgment against the Defendant (ECF No. 13.) On July 26, 2018, the Court, having considered the Motion for Default Judgment and its supporting papers, and havi
Summary: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . On May 24, 2018, the Clerk entered default against Defendant JAMES BRAY dba TEXAS PRIDE TRAILERS (ECF No. 11.) On June 25, 2018, Plaintiff ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY filed a Motion for Default Judgment against the Defendant (ECF No. 13.) On July 26, 2018, the Court, having considered the Motion for Default Judgment and its supporting papers, and havin..
More
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge.
On May 24, 2018, the Clerk entered default against Defendant JAMES BRAY dba TEXAS PRIDE TRAILERS (ECF No. 11.) On June 25, 2018, Plaintiff ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY filed a Motion for Default Judgment against the Defendant (ECF No. 13.) On July 26, 2018, the Court, having considered the Motion for Default Judgment and its supporting papers, and having found that Plaintiff satisfied the procedural and substantive requirements for obtaining a default judgment, granted the motion (ECF No. 18).
For the reasons stated in this Court's Order granting Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 18), the Court hereby orders as follows:
Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company owes no duty to defend James Bray in the action styled Karen Montano et. al. v.Texas Pride Trailers, Inc. et al., Superior Court, Orange County, Case No. 30:2017-00913743-CU-PP-CJC ("Underlying Action") under Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company policy no. LB00013085 issued to James Bray DBA Texas Pride Trailers ("Policy"); and
Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company owes no duty to indemnify James Bray under the Policy against the damages sought from James Bray in the Underlying Action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
