KENLY KIYA KATO, Magistrate Judge.
A. (X) On motion of the Government in a case allegedly involving:
B. ( ) On motion by the Government/( ) on Court's own motion, in a case allegedly involving:
C. The Government ( ) is/( ) is not entitled to a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the defendant's appearance as required and the safety of any person or the community.
A. (X) The Court finds that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure:
B. (X) The Court finds that the defendant has not rebutted by sufficient evidence to the contrary the presumption provided by statute.
The Court has considered:
A. the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a crime of violence, a Federal crime of terrorism, or involves a minor victim or a controlled substance, firearm, explosive, or destructive device;
B. the weight of evidence against the defendant;
C. the history and characteristics of the defendant; and
D. the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or to the community.
The Court also has considered all the evidence adduced at the hearing and the arguments and/or statements of counsel, and the Pretrial Services Report/recommendation.
The Court bases the foregoing finding( s) on the following:
A. (X) As to flight risk: ________________________________________________________ No known bail resources background information unknown alleged offense ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________
B. (X) As to danger: ______________________________________________________________ Alleged offense Prior Record ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________
A. ( ) The Court finds that a serious risk exists that the defendant will:
B. The Court bases the foregoing finding(s) on the following: ______________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________
A. IT is THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendant be detained prior to trial.
B. IT is FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal.
C. IT is FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.
D. IT is FURTHER ORDERED that, on order of a Court of the United States or on request of any attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which the defendant is confined deliver the defendant to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.