Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

JACKSON v. URIBE, ED CV 10-01337-VBF-JC. (2015)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20150204c16 Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 02, 2015
Summary: ORDER Adopting the Report and Recommendation, Denying the Habeas Petition, and Dismissing the Action with Prejudice VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, Senior District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (the "Petition") (CM/ECF Document ("Doc") 1), the respondent's answer and accompanying memorandum of points and authorities (Docs 5-6), the documents lodged by the respondent (Doc 7), petitioner's reply (Doc 8), th
More

ORDER

Adopting the Report and Recommendation, Denying the Habeas Petition, and Dismissing the Action with Prejudice

VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, Senior District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (the "Petition") (CM/ECF Document ("Doc") 1), the respondent's answer and accompanying memorandum of points and authorities (Docs 5-6), the documents lodged by the respondent (Doc 7), petitioner's reply (Doc 8), the applicable law, and the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc 15). Petitioner has not filed objections.

The well-reasoned Report and Recommendation [Doc #15] is ADOPTED.

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus [Doc #1] is DENIED.

This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

Per Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), final judgment will be entered by separate document.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer