Boltex Manufacturing Company, L.P. v. Ulma Piping USA Corp., 4:17-CV-1400. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20181221b38
Visitors: 37
Filed: Dec. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANDREW S. HANEN , District Judge . Pending before the Court in the above referenced proceeding is Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Paragraphs 37, 38 and 39 of Defendant's Counterclaim (Doc. 37); Defendants' response (Doc. 72); Plaintiffs' reply (Doc. 73); and Magistrate Judge Stacy's Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. 76) that the Court grant, in part and deny in part, Plaintiffs' Motion. Defendants did not file objections to the Memorandum and Recommendati
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANDREW S. HANEN , District Judge . Pending before the Court in the above referenced proceeding is Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Paragraphs 37, 38 and 39 of Defendant's Counterclaim (Doc. 37); Defendants' response (Doc. 72); Plaintiffs' reply (Doc. 73); and Magistrate Judge Stacy's Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. 76) that the Court grant, in part and deny in part, Plaintiffs' Motion. Defendants did not file objections to the Memorandum and Recommendatio..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANDREW S. HANEN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in the above referenced proceeding is Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Paragraphs 37, 38 and 39 of Defendant's Counterclaim (Doc. 37); Defendants' response (Doc. 72); Plaintiffs' reply (Doc. 73); and Magistrate Judge Stacy's Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. 76) that the Court grant, in part and deny in part, Plaintiffs' Motion. Defendants did not file objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation within the prescribed amount of time.
Upon review, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's conclusion that paragraph 37 of Defendants' counterclaim (Doc. 68) be stricken; and, as paragraphs 38 and 39 have some bearing on the Defendants' counterclaim, those paragraphs remain. Therefore, the Court hereby
ORDERS that the Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. 76) is ADOPTED. The Court further
ORDERS that paragraph 37 of Defendants' counterclaim is STRICKEN.
Source: Leagle
