KIMBERLIN v. NATIONAL BLOGGERS CLUB, 15-1412. (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20150616120
Visitors: 22
Filed: Jun. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 16, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Brett C. Kimberlin seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing some but not all of his claims in his civil action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545-46 (1949). The order Kimberlin seek
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Brett C. Kimberlin seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing some but not all of his claims in his civil action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545-46 (1949). The order Kimberlin seeks..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Brett C. Kimberlin seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing some but not all of his claims in his civil action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Kimberlin seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Stevenson v. City of Seat Pleasant, 743 F.3d 411, 415-16 (4th Cir. 2014) (citations omitted). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny the motion for sanctions as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Source: Leagle
