Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

STERLING v. CITY OF ANTIOCH, C13-812 NC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150109b30 Visitors: 18
Filed: Nov. 13, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE NATHANAEL COUSINS, Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their respective counsel of record that pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Plaintiffs FRANK STERLING, ROBERT BARR, and TIMOTHY VIERRA dismiss with prejudice the entire action against Defendants CITY OF ANTIOCH, JAMES HYDE, ALLAN CANTANDO, OFFICER KRISTOPHER KINT, OFFICER RICK HOFFMAN, A
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE

NATHANAEL COUSINS, Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their respective counsel of record that pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Plaintiffs FRANK STERLING, ROBERT BARR, and TIMOTHY VIERRA dismiss with prejudice the entire action against Defendants CITY OF ANTIOCH, JAMES HYDE, ALLAN CANTANDO, OFFICER KRISTOPHER KINT, OFFICER RICK HOFFMAN, AND OFFICER ROBERT GREEN, each party to bear its own fees and costs.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION, IT SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer