IN RE EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS CREDIT REPORTING LITIGATION, C 16-05674 WHA (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170130716
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 27, 2017
Summary: CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Following a case management conference on January 19, the Court entered this case management order for nine of the above-captioned cases. A tenth case, Schurig v. Experian, No. 3:16-cv-05701-WHA, was reassigned to the undersigned judge on January 4 and not included in the case management conference, but is also subject to this case management order: 1. All hearings currently set in the above-captioned matters are VACATED. 2. All d
Summary: CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Following a case management conference on January 19, the Court entered this case management order for nine of the above-captioned cases. A tenth case, Schurig v. Experian, No. 3:16-cv-05701-WHA, was reassigned to the undersigned judge on January 4 and not included in the case management conference, but is also subject to this case management order: 1. All hearings currently set in the above-captioned matters are VACATED. 2. All de..
More
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
Following a case management conference on January 19, the Court entered this case management order for nine of the above-captioned cases. A tenth case, Schurig v. Experian, No. 3:16-cv-05701-WHA, was reassigned to the undersigned judge on January 4 and not included in the case management conference, but is also subject to this case management order:
1. All hearings currently set in the above-captioned matters are VACATED.
2. All defendants in the above-captioned matters shall submit a combined motion to dismiss that addresses the single purportedly dispositive issue underlying each individual action. The motion to dismiss shall be filed in each action by FEBRUARY 9.
3. All plaintiffs in the above-captioned matters shall submit a combined opposition to the aforementioned motion to dismiss. The opposition shall be filed in each action by FEBRUARY 23.
4. All defendants in the above-captioned matters may submit a combined reply to the aforementioned opposition. The reply shall be filed in each action by MARCH 2.
5. A hearing on the combined motion to dismiss the above-captioned matters is set for MARCH 23 AT 8:00 A.M.
6. All currently pending motions to dismiss in the above-captioned matters are HELD IN ABEYANCE pending the outcome of the combined motion to dismiss. All currently pending stipulated requests to modify the briefing schedule are DENIED as inconsistent with this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
