ARGENTO v. SYLVANIA LIGHTING SERVICES CORP., 2:15-cv-01277-JAD-NJK. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150812c19
Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 11, 2015
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to transfer pursuant to Rule 45(f), and motion to compel. Docket Nos. 15, 16. The Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to file, no later than August 12, 2015, a copy of the disputed subpoena and any responses thereto. See Local Rule 26-7(a). In addition, it appears that the disputed subpoena in this case is the same subpoena that was in dispute in the motion for protective order previously ruled upon in th
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to transfer pursuant to Rule 45(f), and motion to compel. Docket Nos. 15, 16. The Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to file, no later than August 12, 2015, a copy of the disputed subpoena and any responses thereto. See Local Rule 26-7(a). In addition, it appears that the disputed subpoena in this case is the same subpoena that was in dispute in the motion for protective order previously ruled upon in the..
More
ORDER
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to transfer pursuant to Rule 45(f), and motion to compel. Docket Nos. 15, 16. The Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to file, no later than August 12, 2015, a copy of the disputed subpoena and any responses thereto. See Local Rule 26-7(a). In addition, it appears that the disputed subpoena in this case is the same subpoena that was in dispute in the motion for protective order previously ruled upon in the District of Arizona on August 24, 2014. The Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff's counsel to file, no later than August 12, 2015, a declaration clearly stating whether the subpoena at issue in this dispute is the same subpoena already reviewed in the above order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
