Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation, 3:10-md-02143-RS-JCS (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161102b08 Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 28, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RICHARD G. SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiff HP Inc. ("HP"), formerly known as Hewlett-Packard Company, and Defendants Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America (collectively, "Panasonic"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to Panasonic with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Except as otherw
More

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiff HP Inc. ("HP"), formerly known as Hewlett-Packard Company, and Defendants Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America (collectively, "Panasonic"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to Panasonic with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Except as otherwise agreed to or ordered by the Court, each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims of HP against any other defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned litigation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

FILER ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings Before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I, Beatrice B. Nguyen, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer