Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Austin v. The County of Alameda, 3:15-cv-00942-EMC. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170614872 Visitors: 22
Filed: Jun. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESET CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . The undersigned parties hereby stipulate, and request that the Court order, that the Case Management Conference be continued pursuant to Civil L. R. 6-1(b) and 16-2(e). STIPULATION WHEREAS, on April 24, 2017, the Court granted the parties' order to reset the parties' Case Management Conference to June 15, 2017; WHEREAS, the parties have reached a settlement and have f
More

JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESET CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

The undersigned parties hereby stipulate, and request that the Court order, that the Case Management Conference be continued pursuant to Civil L. R. 6-1(b) and 16-2(e).

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, on April 24, 2017, the Court granted the parties' order to reset the parties' Case Management Conference to June 15, 2017;

WHEREAS, the parties have reached a settlement and have fulfilled the conditions of the settlement agreement;

WHEREAS, the parties' counsel understand that Plaintiff Jamal Austin recently attempted to file a Notice of Dismissal of his claims against all Defendants, but apparently was unsuccessful;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff's settlement counsel are attempting to communicate with Plaintiff regarding this attempt to file the Notice of Dismissal;

WHEREAS, in in view of the settlement, the parties have agreed, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, to continue the Case Management Conference to July 20, 2017 at 10:30 a.m., or a date thereafter that is conducive to the Court's calendar;

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that, subject to Court approval, the Case Management Conference currently set for June 15, 2017 shall be continued to July 20, 2017, and that the deadline for the Joint Case Management Statement be continued accordingly.

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing Joint Notice of Settlement. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Anna Berces, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer